Complaint May 16, 2011 (2024)

Complaint May 16, 2011 (1)

Complaint May 16, 2011 (2)

  • Complaint May 16, 2011 (3)
  • Complaint May 16, 2011 (4)
  • Complaint May 16, 2011 (5)
  • Complaint May 16, 2011 (6)
  • Complaint May 16, 2011 (7)
  • Complaint May 16, 2011 (8)
  • Complaint May 16, 2011 (9)
  • Complaint May 16, 2011 (10)
 

Preview

IN-THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION: CASENO.: Qotl- A- 5373 On =F # Ye me $ Ticor Title Insurance 489 State Road 436, Suite 117 Casselberry, FL 32707 Book8601/Page857 CFN#20060262691 Page 1 of 12Vl WBCD LOAN # 501020565(H) “Riders” means all Riders to this Security Instrumentthat are executed by Borrower. The following Riders are to beexecuted by Borrower [check box as applicable}: (CJAdjustable Rate Rider |Condominium Rider C2 Second Home Rider (Balloon Rider (Planned Unit Development Rider [_]Other(s) [specify] (1-4 Family Rider (Biweekly Payment Rider COWV.A. Rider() “Applicable Law” means all controlling applicable federal, state and local statutes, regulations, ordinances andadministrative rules and orders (that have the effect of law) as well as all applicable final, non-appealable judicialopinions.(@) “Community Association Dues, Fees, and Assessments” means all dues, fees, assessments and other chargesthat are imposed on Borrower or the Property by a condominium association, homeowners association or similarorganization.(K) “Electronic Funds Transfer” means any transfer of funds, other than a transaction originated by check, draft, orsimilar paper instrument, which is initiated throughan electronic terminal, telephonic instrument, computer, or magnetictape so as to order, instruct, or authorize a financial institution to debit or credit an account. Such term includes, but is ‘not limited to, point-of-sale transfers, automated teller machine transactions, transfers initiated by telephone, wire transfers, and automated clearinghouse transfers. (L) “Escrow Items” means those items that are described in Section 3. (M) “Miscellanoous Proceeds” means any compensation, settlement, award of damages, or proceeds paid by any third party (other than insurance proceeds paid under the coverages described in Section 5) for: ()) damage to, or destruction of, the Property; (i) condemnation or other taking of all or any part of the Property; (ji) conveyance in lieuof condemnation; or (iv) misrepresentations of, or omissions as to, the value and/or condition of the Property. (N) “Mortgage Insurance” means insurance protecting Lender against the nonpayment of, or default on, the Loan. (0) “Periodic Payment” means the regularly scheduled amount due for (j) principal and interest under the Note, plus (i) any amounts under Section 3 of this Security Instrument.(P) “RESPA” means the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (12 U.S.C. §2601 et seq.) and its implementingregulation, Regulation X (24 C.F.R. Part 3500), as they might be amended from time to time, or any additional or‘successor legislation or regulation that governs the same subject matter. As used in this Security Instrument, “RESPA” to all requirements and restrictions that are imposed in regard to a “federally related mortgage loan” even if theLoan does not qualify as a “federally related mortgage loan” under RESPA.(Q) “Successor In Intorest of Borrower” means any party that has taken title to the Property, whether or not that partyhas assumed Borrower's obligations under the Note and/or this Security Instrument.TRANSFER OF RIGHTS IN THE PROPERTYThis Security Instrument secures to Lender: ()) the repaymentof the Loan, and all renewals, extensions and modificationsof the Note; and (ji) the performance of Borrower's covenants and agreements under this Security Instrument and the Note. For this purpose, Borrower does hereby mortgage, grant and convey to MERS (solely as nomineefor Lender andLender's successors and assigns) and to the successors and assigns of MERS, the following described property locatedin the CouNTY [Type of Recording Jurisdiction] of Orange[Name of Recording Jurisdiction}:LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOFTax ID #: 35-2228 2835 00 275which currently has the address of 7530 REDWOOD COUNTY ROAD, Orlando, [Steet] [City] Florida 32835 (‘Property Address”): {Zip Code} TOGETHER WITH all the improvements now or hereafter erected on the property, and all easem*nts, appurte- nances, and fixtures now or hereafter a part of the property. All replacements and additions shall also be covered by this Security Instrument. All of the foregoing is referred to in this Security Instrument as the “Property.” Borrower understands and agrees that MERS holds only legal titie to the interests granted by Borrower in this Security Instrument, but, if necessary to comply with law or custom, MERS (as nomineefor Lender and Lender's successors and assigns) has the right: to exercise any or all of those interests, including, but not limited to, the right to foreclose and sg! the Property; and to take any action required of Lender including, but not limited to, releasing and canceling Instrument. FLORIDA-Single Family—Fannio Mae/Froddio Mac UNIFORM INSTRUMENT — Form 3010 1/01 Initials: © 1899-2004 Onfine Documents, Inc. Page 2 of 9 04-03-2006 16:03 Book8601/Page858 CFN#20060262691 Page 2 of 12V1 WBCD LOAB # 501020565 BORROWER COVENANTS that Borrower is lawfully seised of the estate hereby conveyed and has the right tomortgage, grant and convey the Property and that the Property is unencumbered, except for encumbrances of record. warrants and will defend generally the tile to the Property against all claims and demands, subject to anyencumbrances of record. THIS SECURITY INSTRUMENT combines uniform covenants for national use and non-uniform covenants withlimited variations by jurisdiction to constitute a uniform security instrument covering real property. UNIFORM COVENANTS. Borrower and Lender covenant and agree as follows: 1. Paymentof Principal, Interest, Escrow Items, Prepayment Charges, and Late Charges. Borrower shall paywhen due the principalof, and intereston, the debt evidenced by the Note and any prepayment charges andlate chargesdue under the Note. Borrower shall also pay funds for Escrow Items pursuant to Section 3. Payments due under theNote and this Security Instrument shall be made in U.S. currency. However, if any check or other instrument receivedby Lenderas payment under the Note or this Security Instrumentis retumed to Lender unpaid, Lender may require thatany or all subsequent payments due under the Note and this Security instrument be made in one or more of the following forms, as selected by Lender: (a) cash; (b) money order; (c) certified check, bank check, treasurer's check or cashier's check, provided any such check is drawn upon an institution whose deposits are insured by a federal agency,instrumentality, or entity; or (d) Electronic Funds Transfer. Payments are deemed received by Lender when received at the location designated in the Note or at such otherlocation as may be designated by Lender in accordance with the notice provisions in Section 15. Lender may retum anypayment or partial payment if the payment or partial payments are insufficientto bring the Loan current. Lender mayaccept any payment or partial payment insufficient to bring the Loan current, without waiver of any rights hereunder orprejudice to its rights to refuse such payment or partial payments in the future, but Lender is not obligated to apply suchpayments at the time such payments are accepted. if each Periodic Payment is applied as of its scheduled due date,then Lender need not pay interest on unapplied funds. Lender may hold such unapplied funds until Borrower makes:paymentto bring the Loan current. f Borrower does not do so within a reasonable period of time, Lender shall eitherapply such funds or return themto Borrower. lfnot applied earlier, such funds will be applied to the outstanding principalbalance under the Note immediately prior to foreciosure. No offset or claim which Borrower might have now or in thefuture against Lender shall relieve Borrower from making payments due under the Note and this Security instrumentor performing the covenants and agreements secured by this Security Instrument. 2. Application of Paymentsor Proceeds. Exceptas otherwise described in this Section 2, all payments acceptedand applied by Lender shall be applied in the following order of priority: (a) interest due under the Note; (b) principaldue under the Note; (c) amounts due under Section 3. Such payments shall be applied to each Periodic Payment in theorder in which it became due. Any remaining amounts shall be applied firstto late charges, second to any other amountsdue under this Security Instrument, and then to reduce the principal balance of the Note. tf Lender receives a payment from Borrower for a delinquent Periodic Payment which includes a sufficient amountto pay any late charge due, the payment may be applied to the delinquent payment and the late charge. It more thanone Periodic Paymentis outstanding, Lender may apply any payment received from Borrowerto the repayment of thePeriodic Payments if, and to the extent that, each payment can be paid in full. To the extent that any excess exists afterthe payment is applied to the full paymentof one or more Periodic Payments, such excess may be applied to any latecharges due. Votuntary prepayments shall be applied first to any prepayment charges and then as described in the Note. ‘Any application of payments, insurance proceeds, or Miscellaneous Proceeds to principal due under the Note shallnot extend or postpone the due date, or change the amount, of the Periodic Payments. 3. Funds for Escrow Items. Borrower shall payto Lenderon the day Periodic Payments are due under the Note,until the Note is paid in full, a sum (the “Funds’) to provide for payment of amounts due for: (a) taxes and assessmentsand other items which can attain priority over this Security Instrument as a lien or encumbrance on the Property; (b)leasehold payments or ground rents on the Property, if any: (c) premiums for any and all insurance required by Lenderunder Section 5; and (d) Mortgage Insurance premiums, if any, or any sums payable by Borrower to Lender in lieu ofthe payment of Mortgage Insurance premiums in accordance with the provisions of Section 10. These items are called“Escrow Items.” Atorigination or at any time during the term of the Loan, Lender may require that Community Association‘Dues, Fees, and Assessments, if any, be escrowed by Borrower, and such dues, fees and assessments shall be anEscrow Item. Borrower shall promptly furnish to Lender all notices of amounts to be paid under this Section. Borrowershall pay Lender the Funds for Escrow Items unless Lender waives Borrower's obligation to pay the Funds for any orall Escrow Items. Lender may waive Borrower's obligation to pay to Lender Funds for any or all Escrow Items at any time. when and where payable,‘Any such waiver may only be in writing, In the event of such waiver, Borrower shall pay directly, the amounts due for any Escrow Items for which payment of Funds has been waived by Lender and, if Lender requires, shall fumish to Lender receipts evidencing such payment within such time period as Lender may require. Borrower's obligation to make such payments and to provide receipts shall for all purposes be deemed to be a covenant and agreement contained in this Security Instrument, as the phrase “covenant and agreement” is used in Section 9. If to a waiver, and Borrower fails to pay the amount due for Borrower is obligated to pay Escrow Items directly, pursuant an Escrow ttem, Lender may exercise its rights under Section 9 and pay such amount and Borrower shall then be obligated under Section 9 to repay to Lender any such amount. Lender may revoke the waiver as to any or all Escrow Items at any time by a notice given in accordance with Section 15 and, upon such revocation, Borrower shall pay to Lender all Funds, and in such amounts, that are then required under this Section 3. Lender may, at any time, collect and hold Funds in an amount (a) sufficient to permit Lenderto apply the Funds at the time specified under RESPA, and (b) notto exceed the maximum amounta lender can require under ‘RESPA. Lender shall estimate the amount of Funds due on the basis of current data and reasonable estimates of expenditys Escrow Items or otherwise in accordance with Applicable Law.FLORIDA-Single Femily-Fannle Mao/Freddie Mac UNIFORM INSTRUMENT — Form 3010 1/01 Initials: ‘© 1999-2004 Online Documents, Inc. Page 3 of 9 04-03-2006 16:03 Book8601/Page859_ CFN#20060262691 Page 3 of 12V1 WBCD LOAN # 501020565 The Funds shail be held in an institution whose deposits are insured by a federal agency, instrumentality, or entity{including Lender, if Lender is an institution whose deposits are so insured) or in any Federal Home Loan Bank. Lendershall apply the Funds to pay the Escrow Items no later than the time specified under RESPA. Lender shall not charge Borrowerfor holding and applying the Funds, annually analyzing the escrow account, or verifying the Escrow Items, unless Lender pays Borrower interest on the Funds and Applicable Law permits Lender to make such a charge. Unlessan agreementis madein writing or Applicable Law requires interestto be paid on the Funds, Lender shall notbe requiredto pay Borrower any interest or earings on the Funds. Borrower and Lender can agree in writing, however, that interestshall be paid on the Funds. Lender shall giveto Borrower, without charge, an annual accounting of the Funds as requiredby RESPA. If there is a surplus of Funds held in escrow, as defined under RESPA, Lender shall account to Borrower for the‘excess funds in accordance with RESPA. if there is a shortageof Funds held in escrow, as defined under RESPA, Lendershall notify Borrower as required by RESPA, and Borrower shall payto Lender the amount necessary to make up theshortage in accordance with RESPA, but in no more than 12 monthly payments. If there is a deficiency of Funds heldjin escrow, as defined under RESPA, Lender shall notify Borrower as required by RESPA, and Borrower shall pay toLender the amount necessary to make up the deficiency in accordance with RESPA, but in no more than 12 monthlypayments. Upon payment in full of all sums secured by this Security Instrument, Lender shalll promptly refund to Borrower anyFunds held by Lender. 4. Charges; Liens. Borrower shall pay all taxes, assessments, charges, fines, and impositions attributable to theProperty which can attain priority over this Security Instrument, leasehold payments or ground rents on the Property,itany, and Community Association Dues, Fees, and Assessments, ifany. To the extent thatthese items are Escrow Items, Borrower shall pay them in the manner provided in Section 3. Borrower shall promptly discharge any lien which has priority over this Security Instrument unless Borrower: (a) agrees in writing to the payment of the obligation secured by the lien in a manner acceptable to Lender, but only solong as Borrower is performing such agreement; (b) contests the lien in good faith by, or defends against enforcement of the fien in, tegal proceedings which in Lender's opinion operate to prevent the enforcement of the lien while those proceedings are pending, but only until such proceedings are concluded; or (c) secures from the holder of the lien an agreement satisfactory to Lender subordinating the lien to this Security Instrument. If Lender determines that any partof the Property is subjectto a lien which can attain priority over this Security Instrument, Lender may give Borrower anotice identifying the lien. Within 10 days of the date on which that notice is given, Borrower shall satisfy the lien or take‘one or more of the actions set forth above in this Section 4. Lender may require Borrower to pay a one-time charge fora real estate tax verification and/or reporting service usedby Lender in connection with this Loan. 6. Property Insurance. Borrower shall keep the improvements now existing or hereafter erected on the Propertyinsured against loss by fire, hazards included within the term “extended coverage,” and any other hazards including,but not limited to, earthquakes and floods, for which Lender requires insurance. This insurance shall be maintained inthe amounts (including deductible levels) and for the periods that Lender requires. What Lender requires pursuanttothe preceding sentences can change during the term of the Loan. The insurance carrier providing the insurance shallbe chosen by Borrower subject to Lender’s rightto disapprove Borrower's choice, which right shall not be exercisedunreasonably. Lender may require Borrower to pay, in connection with this Loan, either: (a) a one-time charge for floodzone determination, certification and tracking services; or (b) a one-time charge for flood zone determination andcertification services and subsequent charges each time remappings or similar changes occur which reasonably mightaffect such determination or certification. Borrower shall also be responsible for the payment of any fees imposed bythe Federal Emergency Management Agency in connection with the review of any flood zone determination resultingfrom an objection by Borrower. Hf Borrower fails to maintain any of the coverages described above, Lender may obtain insurance coverage, atLender's option and Borrower's expense. Lender is under no obligation to purchase any particular type or amount ofcoverage. Therefore, such coverage shail cover Lender, but might or might not protect Borrower, Borrower's equity inthe Property, or the contents of the Property, against any risk, hazard or liability and might provide greater or lesser coverage than was previously in effect. Borrower acknowledges that the cost of the insurance coverage so obtained might significantly exceed the cost of insurance that Borrower could have obtained. Any amounts disbursed by Lender under this Section 5 shall become additional debt of Borrower secured by this Security Instrument. These amounts shall bear interest at the Note rate from the date of disbursem*nt and shall be payable, with such interest, upon notice from Lender to Borrower requesting payment. Alll insurance policies required by Lender and renewals of such policies shall be subject to Lender's right to disapprove such policies, shall include a standard mortgage clause, and shall name Lender as mortgagee and/or as an additional loss payee. Lender shall have the right to hold the policies and renewal certificates. If Lender requires, Borrower shall promptly give to Lender all receipts of paid premiums and renewal notices. If Borrower obtains any form ofinsurance coverage, not otherwise required by Lender, for damage to, or destruction of, the Property, such policy shall include a standard mortgage clause and shall name Lender as mortgagee and/or as an additional loss payee. In the event of loss, Borrower shall give prompt notice to the insurance carrier and Lender. Lender may make proof of loss if not made promptly by Borrower. Unless Lender and Borrower otherwise agree in writing, any insurance proceeds, whether or not the underlying insurance was required by Lender, ‘shall be applied to restoration or repair of the Property, ifthe restoration or repair is economically feasible and Lender's security is ‘notlessened. During such repair and restoration period, Lender shall have the right to hold such insurance proceeds until Lender has had an opportunity to inspect such Propertyto ensure the work has been completed to Lender's satisfaction, provided that such inspection shall be undertaken promptly. Lender may disburse proceeds for the repairs and restoration in a single payment or i a series of progress payments as the work is completed. Unless an agreement is made in writing or Ap} FLORIDA-Single Famiy-Fannle Mao/Froddie Mac UNIFORM INSTRUMENT — Form 3010 1/01 Initials:‘© 1999-2004 Onfine Documents, Inc. Page 40f9 04-03-2006 16:03 Book8601/Page860 CFN#20060262691 Page 4 of 12V1 WECD LoaN # 501020565 requires interestto be paid on such insurance proceeds, Lender shall not be required to pay Borrower any interest or eamings on such proceeds. Fees for public adjusters, or other third parties, retained by Borrower shall not be paid outof the insurance proceeds and shall be the sole obligation of Borrower. If the restoration or repair is not economically feasibleor Lender's security would be lessened, the insurance proceeds shall be applied to the sums secured by thisSecurity Instrument, whether or not then due, with the excess, if any, paid to Borrower. Such insurance proceeds shallbe applied in the order provided for in Section 2. if Borrower abandons the Property, Lender may file, negotiate and settle any available insurance claim and relatedmatters. If Borrower does not respond within 30 days to a notice from Lender that the insurance carrier has offered tosettle a claim, then Lender may negotiate and settle the claim. The 30-day period will begin when the notice is given.In either event, or if Lender acquires the Property under Section 22 or otherwise, Borrower hereby assigns to Lender(a) Borrower's rights to any insurance proceeds in an amount nat to exceed the amounts unpaid under the Note or this‘Security Instrument, and (b) any other of Borrower's rights (other than the right to any refund of uneamed premiumspaid by Borrower) under all insurance policies covering the Property, insofar as such rights are applicable to thecoverage of the Property. Lender may use the insurance proceeds either to repair or restore the Property or to payamounts unpaid under the Note or this Security instrument, whether or not then due. 6. Occupancy. Borrower shall occupy, establish, and use the Property as Borrower's principal residence within60 days after the execution of this Security Instrumentand shall continue to occupy the Property as Borrower's principalresidence for at least one year after the date of occupancy, unless Lender otherwise agrees in writing, which consent‘shall not be unreasonably withheld, or unless extenuating circ*mstances exist which are beyond Borrower's control. 7. Preservation, Maintenance and Protection of the Property; Inspections. Borrower shall not destroy,damage or impair the Property, allow the Property to deteriorate or commit waste on the Property. Whether or notBorrower is residing in the Property, Borrower shall maintain the Property in order to prevent the Property fromdeteriorating or decreasing in value due to its condition. Unless it is determined pursuant to Section 5 that repair orrestoration is not economically feasible, Borrower shall promptly repair the Property if damaged to avoid furtherdeterioration or damage. if insuranceor condemnation proceeds are paid in connection with damage to, or the takingof, the Property, Borrower shall be responsible for repairing or restoring the Property only if Lender has releasedproceeds for such purposes. Lender may disburse proceeds for the repairs and restoration in a single payment or ina series of progress payments as the work is completed. If the insurance or condemnation proceeds are not sufficientto repairor restore the Property, Borrower is not relieved of Borrower's obligation for the completion of such repair orrestoration. Lender or its agent may make reasonable entries upon and inspections of the Property. If ithas reasonable cause,Lender may inspect the interiorof the improvements on the Property. Lender shalll give Borrower notice at the time ofor priorto such an interior inspection specifying such reasonable cause. 8. Borrower's Loan Application. Borrower shall be in default if, during the Loan application process, Borrowercor any persons oF entities acting at the direction of Borrower or with Borrower's knowledge or consent gave materiallyfalse, misleading, or inaccurate information or statements to Lender (or failed to provide Lender with material information)in connection with the Loan. Material representations include, but are not limited to, representations concemingBorrower's occupancy of the Property as Borrower's principal residence. 9. Protection of Lender's Interest In the Property and Rights Under this Securtty Instrument. If (a) Borrowerfails to perform the covenants and agreements contained in this Security Instrument, (b) theres a legal proceeding thatmight significantly affect Lender's interest in the Property andor rights under this Security Instrument (such as a proceeding in bankruptcy, probate, for condemnation or forfeiture, for enforcement of a lien which may attain priority or to enforce laws or regulations), or (c) Borrower has abandoned the Property, then Lendercover this Security Instrument may do and pay for whatever is reasonable or appropriate to protect Lender's interest in the Property and rights underthis Security instrument, including protecting and/or assessing the value of the Property, and securing and/or repairingthe Property. Lender's actions can include, butare notlimited to: (a) paying any sums secured by alien which has prioritycover this Security Instrument; (b) appearing in court; and (c) paying reasonable attomeys' fees to protectit* interest inthe Property and/or rights under this Security Instrument, including its secured position in a bankruptcy proceeding.Securing the Property includes, but is not limited to, entering the Property to make repairs, change locks, replace orboard up doors and windows, drain water from pipes, eliminate building or other code violations or dangerousconditions, and have utilities tumed on or off. Although Lender may take action under this Section 9, Lender does nothave to do so and is not under any duty or obligation to do so. It is agreed that Lender incurs no liability for not takingany or all actions authorized under this Section 9. Any amounts disbursed by Lender under this Section 9 shall become additional debt of Borrower secured by thisSecurity instrument. These amounts shall bear interest at the Note rate from the date of disbursem*nt and shall bepayable, with such interest, upon notice from Lenderto Borrower requesting payment. Ifthis Security Instrumentis ona leasehold, Borrower shall comply with all the provisions of the lease. Borrower: ‘shall not surrender the leasehold estate and interests herein conveyed or terminateor cancel the ground lease. Borrower shall not, without the express written consent of Lender, alter or amend the ground lease. If Borrower acquires fee title to the Property, the leasehold and the fee tite shall not merge unless Lender agrees to the merger inLoan, writing. 10. Mortgage Insuran ce. Mortgage Insurance as a condition of making the If Lenderrequired Borrower shallpay the premiums required to maintain the Mortgage Insurance in effect. f, for any reason, the Mortgage Insurance coverage required by Lender ceases to be available from the mortgage insurer that previously provided such insurance and Borrower was required to make separately designated payments toward the premiums for Mortgage Insurance, Borrower shall pay the premiums required to obtain coverage substantially equivalent to the Mortgage Insurance previously in effect, at a cost substantially equivalent to the cost to Borrower of the Mortgage Insurance previously in effect, trom an altemiate mortgageinsurer selected by Lender. If substantially equivalent Mortgage Insurance coverage is not: ‘available, Borrower shall of the separately designated payments that were due when the insurance covera¢ ed to payto Lender the amount FLORIDA-Single Family-Fannle Mae/Freddio Mac UNIFORM INSTRUMENT — Form 3010 1/01 Initials: x ‘© 1999-2004 Online Documents, Inc. Page 5 of 9 ED 402 04-03-2006 16103 Book8601/Page861 CFN#20060262691 Page 5 of 12Vl WBCD LOAN # 501020565to be in effect. Lender will accept, use and retain these payments as a non-refundable loss reserve in lieu of Mortgage Insurance. Such loss reserve shall be non-refundable, notwithstanding the fact that the Loan is ultimately paid in full, andLender shall not be required to pay Borrower any interest or eamings on such loss reserve. Lender can no longer require loss reserve payments if Mortgage Insurance coverage (in the amount and for the period that Lender requires) provided by an insurer selected by Lender again becomes available, is obtained, and Lender requires separately designated paymentstoward the premiums for Mortgage Insurance. If Lender required Mortgage Insurance as a condition of making the Loan and Borrower was required to make separately designated payments toward the premiums for Mortgage Insurance, Borrowershall pay the premiums required to maintain Mortgage Insurance in effect, or to provide a non-refundable loss reserve, untitLender's requirement for Mortgage Insurance ends in accordance with anywritten agreement between Borrower and Lender providing for such termination or until termination is required by ApplicableLaw. Nothing in this Section 10 affects Borrower'sobligation to pay Interest at the rate provided in the Note. Mortgage Insurance reimburses Lender (or any entity that purchases the Note) for certain losses it may incur if Borrower does not repay the Loan as agreed. Borrower is not a party to the Mortgage Insurance. Mortgage insurers evaluate their total risk on all such insurance in force from time to time, and may enter intoagreements with other parties that share or modify their risk, or reduce losses. These agreements are on terms and conditions that are satistactory to the mortgage insurer and the other party (or parties) to these agreements. These agreements may require the mortgage insurerto make payments using any source of funds that the mortgage insurer may have available (which may i lude funds obtained from Mortgage Insurance premiums). As aresult of these agreements, Lender, any purchaser of the Note, another insurer, any reinsurer, any other: entity, orany affilate of any of the foregoing, may receive (directly or indirectly) amounts that derivefrom (or mightbe characterizedas) a portion of Borrower's payments for Mortgage Insurance, in exchange for sharing or modifying the mortgage insurer'stisk, ar reducing losses. If such agreement provides that an affiliate of Lender takes a share of the insurer's riskin exchangefor a share of the premiums paid to the insurer, the arrangementis often termed “captive reinsurance.” Further. (a) Any such agreoments will not affect the amounts that Borrowor has agreed to pay for MortgageInsurance, or any other terms of the Loan. Such agreements will not increase the amount Borrower will owe for Mortgage Insurance, and they will not entitle Borrowerto any refund. (®) Any such agreements will not affect the rights Borrower has - If any - with respect to the Mortgage Insurance under the Homeowners Protection Act of 1998 or any other law. These rights may include the righttorecolve certaln disclosures, to request and obtan cancellation ofthe Mortgage Insurance, to have the MortgageInsurance terminated automatically, and/orto recelve a refund of any Mortgage Insurance premiums that wereuneared at the time of such cancellation or termination. 11. Assignmentof Miscellaneous Proceeds; Forfeiture. All Miscellaneous Proceeds are hereby assignedto andshall be paid to Lender. Ifthe Property is damaged, such Miscellaneous Proceeds shall be applied to restoration or repair of the Property, ifthe restorationor repairis economically feasible and Lender's securityisnot lessened. During such repair and restoration period,Lender shallhave the rightto hold such Miscellaneous Proceeds until Lender has had an opportunity toinspect such Propertyto ensure the work has been completed to Lender's satisfaction, provided thatsuch inspection shall be undertaken promptly.Lender may pay for the repairs and restoration in a single disbursem*nt or in a series of progress payments as the work is‘completed. Unless an agreement is made in writing or Applicable Law requires interest to be paid on such MiscellaneousProceeds, Lender shall not be required to pay Borrower any interest or eamings on such Miscellaneous Proceeds. If therestoration or repairis not economically feasible or Lender's security would be lessened, the Miscellaneous Proceeds shallbe appliedto the sums secured by this Security Instrument, whether or notthen due, with the excess, if any, paid to Borrower.‘Such Miscellaneous Proceeds shall be applied in the order provided for in Section 2. Inthe eventof a otal taking, destruction, orloss in value of the Property, the Miscellan eous Proceeds shallbe appliedto the sums secured by this Security instrument, whether or not then due, with the excess, if any, paid to Borrower, Inthe event ofa partial taking, destruction, or loss in value of the Property in which the fair market value ofthe Propertyimmediately before the partial taking, destruction, or loss in value is equal to or greater than the amount of the sumssecured by this Security Instrument immediately before the partial taking, destruction, or loss in value, unless Borrowerand Lender otherwise agree in writing, the sums secured by this Security Instrument shall be reduced by the amount ofthe Miscellaneous Proceeds multiplied by the following fractior the total amount of the sums secured immediately before the partial taking, destruction, or loss in value divided by (b) the fair market value of the Property immediately before the partial taking, destruction, or loss in value. Any balance shall be paid to Borrower. Inthe event ofa partial taking, destruction, or loss in value of the Property in which the fair market value of the Propertyimmediately before the partial taking, destruction, or toss in value is less than the amount of the sums securedimmediately before the partial taking, destruction, or loss in value, unless Borrower and Lender otherwise agree inwriting, the Miscellaneous Proceeds shall be applied to the sums secured by this Security Instrument whether or notthe sums are then due. or if, after notice Ifthe Propertyis abandoned by Borrower that the Opposing Party (as defined , by Lender to Borrower in the next sentence) offers to make an award to settlea claim for damages, Borrower fails to respond to Lender within 30 days after the date the notice is given, Lender is authorized to collect and apply the Miscellaneous Proceeds either to restoration or repair of the Property or to the sums secured by this Security Instrument, whether or not then dus. “Opposing Party” means the third party that owes Borrower Miscellaneous Proceeds or the party against whom Borrower has a right of action in regard to Miscellaneous Proceeds. Borrower shall be in defaultif any action or proceeding, whether civil or criminal, is begun that, in Lender's judgment, could resutt in forfeiture of the Property or other material impairmentof Lender's interest in the Property or rights underin this Security Instrument. Borrower can cure such a default and, if acceleration has occurred, reinstate as provided Section 19, by causing the action or proceeding to be dismissed with a ruling that, in Lender's judgment, forteiture of the Property or other material impairment of Lender's interest in the Property or rights under rity FLORIDA-Single Famiy-Fannie Mao/Froddio Mac UNIFORM INSTRUMENT — Form 3010 1/01 Initials: 4 © 1999-2004 Onine Documents, Inc. Page 6 of 9 D 0402 04-03-2006 16:03 Book8601/Page862 CFN#20060262691 Page 6 of 12V1 WBCD LOAN # 501020565Instrument. The proceeds of any award or claim for damages that are attributable to the impairment of Lender's interestin the Property are hereby assigned and shall be paid to Lender. All Miscellaneous Proceeds that are not applied to restoration or repair of the Property shall be applied in the order provided for in Section 2. 12. Borrower Not Released; Forbearance By Lender Nota Walver. Extension of the time for payment or modification of amortization of the sums secured by this Security Instrument granted by Lenderto Borrower or any Successor in Interestof Borrower shall not operate to release the Bability of Borrower or any Successors in Interest of Borrower. Lender shall notbe required to commence proceedings against any Successor n Interest of Borrower or to refuse to extend timefor paymentor otherwise modify amortization of the sums secured by this Security Instrument by reason of any demand made by theoriginal Borrower or any Successors in interest of Borrower. Any forbearance by Lender in exercising any right or remedy including, without limitation, Lender's acceptance of payments from third persons, entities or Successors in Interest ofBorrower orin amounts less than the amount then due, shall notbe a waiver of or preclude the exercise of any rightorremedy. 13. Joint and Severa! Liability; Co-signers; Successors and Assigns Bound. Borrower covenants and agreesthat Borrower's obligations and liability shall be joint and ral. However, any Borrower who co-signs this Security Instrument but does not execute the Note (a “co-signer”): ) is co-signing this Security Instrument onlyto mortgage, grantand convey the co-signer’s interest in the Property under the terms of this Security Instrument; (b) is notpersonallyobligated to pay the sums secured by this Security Instrument; and (c) agrees that Lender and any other Borrower canagree to extend, modify, forbear or make any accommodations with regard to the terms of this Security instrument orthe Note without the co-signer’s consent. ‘Subject to the provisions of Section 18, any Successorin Interest of Borrower who assumes Borrower's obligationsunder this Security Instrument in writing, and is approved by Lender, shall obtain all of Borrower's rights and benefitsunder this Security Instrument. Borrower shall not be released from Borrower's obligations and liability under this Security Instrument unless Lender agrees to such release in writing. The covenants and agreements of this Security Instrument shall bind (except as provided in Section 20) and benefit the successors and assigns of Lender. 14. Loan Charges. Lender may charge Borrower fees for services| in connection with Borrower's default, forthe purpose of protecting Lender's interestiin the Property and rights under this Security Instrument, including, butnotlimited to, attorneys’ fees, property inspection and valuation fees. in regard to any other fees, the absence of express authority inthis Security Instrument to charge a specific fee to Borrower shall not be construed as a prohibition on the charging of suchfee. Lender may not charge fees that are expressly prohibited by this Security Instrument or by Ap} Law. Ifthe Loan is subject toa law which sets maximum loan charges, and that law is finally interpreted so that the interest or other loan charges collected or to be collected in connection with the Loan exceed the permitted limits, then: (a) any such loan charge shall be reduced by the amount necessary to reduce the chargeto the permitted limit; and (b) anysums already collected from Borrower which exceeded permitted limits will be refunded to Borrower. Lender may chooseto make this refund by reducing the principal owed under the Note or by making a direct payment to Borrower. Ifarefundreduces principal, the reduction will be treated as a partial prepayment without any prepayment charge (whether or nota prepayment charge is provided for under the Note). Borrower's acceptance of any such refund made by directpayment to Borrower will constitute a waiver of any right of action Borrower might have arising out of such overcharge. 15. Notices. All notices given by Borrower or Lender in connection with this Security Instrument must be in writing. Anynotice to Borrower in connection with this Security Instrument shall be deemed to have been given to Borrower when mailedby first class mail or when actually delivered to Borrower's notice address if sentby other means. Notice to any one Borrowershall constitute notice to all Borrowers unless Applicable Law expressly requires otherwise. The notice address shall be the Property Address unless Borrower has designated a substitute notice address by notice to Lender. Borrower shall promptly notify Lender of Borrower's change of address. tf Lender specifies a procedure for reporting Borrower's change of address,then Borrower shall only report a change of address through that specified procedure. There may be only one designated notice address under this Security Instrumentatany onetime, Any noticeto Lendershall be given by delivering itor by mailingitby first class mailto Lender's address stated herein unless Lender has designated another address by notice to Borrower.Anynoticein connection with this Security Instrumentshallnotbe deemed to have been given to Lender untiactually receivedby Lender. if any notice required by this Security instrument is also required under Applicable Law, the Applicable Lawrequirement will satisfy the ding requirement under this Security Instrument. 16. Governing Law; Severability; Rules of Construction. This Security Instrument shall be governed by federal law and the law of the jurisdiction In which the Property is located. All rights and obligations contained in this Security Instrument and limitations are subject to any requirements of Applicable Law. Applica ble Law might explicitly or implicitlyallow the parties to agree bycontractorit mightbe silent, butsuch silence shall notbe construed as a prohibition againstagreement by contract. In the event that any provision or clause of this Security Instrument or the Note conflicts withApplicable Law, such conflict shall not affect other provisions of this Security Instrument or the Note which can be giveneffect without the conflicting provision. Asused in this Security Instrument: (a) words of the masculine gender shall mean and include corresponding neuterwords or words of the feminine gender; (b) words in the singular shall mean and include the plural and vice versa; and (©) the word “may” gives sole discretion without any obligation to take any action. 17. Borrower's Copy. Borrower shall be given one copy of the Note and of this Security Instrument. 18. Transfer of the Property or a Benoficlal Interest In Borrower. As used in this Section 18, “Interest in the Property” means any legal or beneficial interest in the Property, i luding, but not limited to, those beneficial interests transferred in a bond for deed, contract for deed, installment sales contract or escrow agreement, the intent of which is the transfer of title by Borrower at a future date to a purchaser. {fall or any part of the Property or any interest in the Property is sold or transferred {or it Borrower is not a natural person and a beneficial interest in Borrower is sold or transferred) without Lender's prior written consent, Lender may fequire immediate payment in full of all sums secured by this Security Instrument. However, this option sI ‘exercised by Lender if such exercise is prohibited by Applicable Law. FLORIDA-Single Family-Fannle Mae/Freddie Mac UNIFORM INSTRUMENT Form 3010 1/01 Initials: © 199.2004 Ontine Documents, Inc. Pago 7 of 9 04-03-2006 16:03 Book8601/Page863_ CFN#20060262691 Page 7 of 12V1 WBCD LOAB # 501020565 tt Lender exercises this option, Lender shall give Borrower notice of acceleration. The notice shall provide a periodof not less than 30 days from the date the noticeis given in accordance with Section 15 within which Borrower must pay all sums secured by this Security Instrument. if Borrower fails to pay these sums prior to the expiration of this period, Lender may invoke any remedies permitted by this Security Instrument without further notice or demand on Borrower. 19, Borrower's Right to Reinstate After Acceleration. if Borrower meets certain conditions, Borrower shall have theright to have enforcementof this Security Instrument discontinued at any time prior to the earfiest of: (a) five days before saleof the Property pursuant to any power of sale contained in this Security instrument; (b) such other period as Applicable Lawmight spectty for the termination of Borrower's right to reinstate; or (c) entry of a judgment enforcing this Security Instrument. ‘Those conditions are that Borrower: (a) pays Lender all sums which then would be due under this Security Instrument andthe Note asifno acceleration had occurred; (b) cures any default of any other covenants or agreements; (c) pays all expensesincurred in enforcing this Security Instrument, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys’ fees, property inspection and valuation fees, and other fees incurred for the purpose of protecting Lender's interestin the Property and rights underthis Security Instrument; and (d) takes such actionas Lender may reasonably require to assure that Lender's interestin theProperty and rights under this Security Instrument, and Borrower's obligation to pay the sums secured by this Security Instrument,shall continue unchanged. Lender may require that Borrower pay such reinstatement sums and expenses in one‘or more of the following forms, as selected by Lender: (a) cash; (b) money order, (c) certified check, bank check, treasurer'scheck or cashier's check, provided any such check is drawn upon an institution whose deposits are insured by a federalagency, instrume

Related Contentin Orange County

Case

NEWREZ LLC vs. ROLDAN, CATHELINEet al.

Aug 21, 2024 |Margaret H. Schreiber |CA - Homestead Residential Foreclosure btwn $50,001-$249,999 |CA - Homestead Residential Foreclosure btwn $50,001-$249,999 |2024-CA-007442-O

Case

FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATIONvs.WISE, JASON et al.

Aug 20, 2024 |Margaret H. Schreiber |CA - Nonhomestead Residential Foreclosure ($50,001-249,999) |CA - Nonhomestead Residential Foreclosure ($50,001-249,999) |2024-CA-007414-O

Case

BELILLA, VICTOR JAVIERvs.ARAGON, WENDY

Aug 19, 2024 |A. James Craner, III |CA - Other Real Property Actions (above $250,000) |CA - Other Real Property Actions (above $250,000) |2024-CA-007368-O

Case

PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION vs. HANKERSON, LATRICIA YEVETTEet al.

Aug 20, 2024 |Eric J. Netcher |CA - Homestead Residential Foreclosure btwn $50,001-$249,999 |CA - Homestead Residential Foreclosure btwn $50,001-$249,999 |2024-CA-007393-O

Case

SHERATON FLEX VACATIONS LLC A FLORIDA LIMITED LIvs.PADDOCK, JAMES A et al.

Aug 22, 2024 |Luis F. Calderon |CA - Other Real Property Actions (up to $50,000) |CA - Other Real Property Actions (up to $50,000) |2024-CA-007484-O

Case

BEACON PARK PHASE 3 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INCvs.ROMERO DUBON, JOSE DAVID et al.

Aug 21, 2024 |Luis F. Calderon |CA - Other Real Property Actions (up to $50,000) |CA - Other Real Property Actions (up to $50,000) |2024-CA-007429-O

Case

US BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION NOT IN ITS INDvs.ZAVARCE, IVAN G et al.

Aug 22, 2024 |Brian S. Sandor |CA - Nonhomestead Residential Foreclosure ($50,001-249,999) |CA - Nonhomestead Residential Foreclosure ($50,001-249,999) |2024-CA-007507-O

Case

NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNIONvs.JOHNSON, GAIL MARGO et al.

Aug 21, 2024 |Chad K. Alvaro |CA - Nonhomestead Residential Foreclosure (up to $50,000) |CA - Nonhomestead Residential Foreclosure (up to $50,000) |2024-CA-007423-O

Case

FLORIDA LIVING REAL ESTATE INC AS TRUSTEE OF THEvs.SPOON, PATRICIA J et al.

Aug 22, 2024 |Brian S. Sandor |CA - Other Real Property Actions (up to $50,000) |CA - Other Real Property Actions (up to $50,000) |2024-CA-007478-O

Ruling

JAMES LATTIMORE AND CHERYL LATTIMORE INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEES OF THE LATTIMORE FAMILY TRUST DATED SEPTEMBER 30 2004 vs. KEVIN JENNINGS DBA JENNINGS CONSTRUCTION et al

Aug 26, 2024 |22CV12749

No appearances are necessary. The hearing is vacated as the matter is set for trial.

Ruling

LLOYD VS. LLOYD, ET AL

Aug 23, 2024 |CVCV20-0195922

LLOYD VS. LLOYD, ET ALCase Number: CVCV20-0195922This matter is on calendar for review regarding status of case and Plaintiff’s counsel. As discussed at multipleprevious hearings, Plaintiff may not proceed in pro per as she is representing the trust. An appearance isnecessary on today’s calendar.

Ruling

VICTOR GODALES VS MEI KUEN CHEUNG AND JIMMY TM CHEUNG AS TRUSTEES OF THE CHEUNG FAMILY TRUST DATED OCT 10, 1996

Aug 27, 2024 |24STCV01620

Case Number: 24STCV01620 Hearing Date: August 27, 2024 Dept: 48 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT VICTOR GODALES, Plaintiff, vs. MEI KUEN CHEUNG AND JIMMY TM CHEUNG AS TRUSTEES OF THE CHEUNG FAMILY TRUST DATED OCT 10, 1996, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: 24STCV01620 [TENTATIVE] ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO COMPEL RESPONSES AND MOTION TO DEEM RFAs ADMITTED Dept. 48 8:30 a.m. August 27, 2024 On January 22, 2024, Plaintiff Victor Godales filed this action against Defendant Mei Kuen Cheung and Jimmy Tm Cheung as Trustees of the Cheung Family Trust Dated Oct 10, 1996. On May 20, 2024, Defendant served Form Interrogatories, Special Interrogatories, Requests for Production of Documents, and Requests for Admissions on Plaintiff. Plaintiff did not provide any responses. On August 1 and 2, 2024, Defendant filed motions to compel responses and to deem the RFAs admitted. Where a party fails to serve timely responses to discovery requests, the court may make an order compelling responses. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2030.290, 2031.300; Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 403.) A party that fails to serve timely responses waives any objections to the request, including ones based on privilege or the protection of attorney work product. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2030.290, subd. (a), 2031.300, subd. (a).) When a party fails to timely respond to a request for admission, the propounding party may move for an order that the genuineness of any documents and the truth of any matters specified in the requests be deemed admitted. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280, subd. (b).) The party who failed to respond waives any objections to the demand, unless the court grants them relief from the waiver, upon a showing that the party (1) has subsequently served a substantially compliant response, and (2) that the partys failure to respond was the result of mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280, subds. (a)(1)-(2).) The court shall grant a motion to deem admitted requests for admissions, unless it finds that the party to whom the requests for admission have been directed has served, before the hearing on the motion, a proposed response to the requests for admission that is in substantial compliance with Section 2033.220. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280, subd. (c).) Plaintiff filed no oppositions to these motions and did not serve timely responses. It does not appear that Plaintiff served substantially compliant responses prior to the hearing. Accordingly, the motions are GRANTED. Plaintiff is ordered to provide verified responses, without objections, to Form Interrogatories, Special Interrogatories, and Requests for Production of Documents within 30 days. The Requests for Admission served on May 20, 2024 are deemed admitted by Plaintiff. The requests for sanctions are granted. Plaintiff is ordered to pay total sanctions of $3,400.00 ($850 each for 4 motions) to Defendant within 30 days. Moving party to give notice. Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at SMCDEPT48@lacourt.org indicating intention to submit. If all parties in the case submit on the tentative ruling, no appearances before the Court are required unless a companion hearing (for example, a Case Management Conference) is also on calendar. Dated this 27th day of August 2024 Hon. Thomas D. Long Judge of the Superior Court

Ruling

Aug 20, 2024 |CVRI2403157

B&B CARRIER, INC. VSCVRI2403157 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIONEAST WEST BANKTentative Ruling: Deny motion.A motion for preliminary injunction must show (1) a probability of prevailing on the merits,and (2) that the balance of hardships favors issuance of the injunction. (O’Connell v. SuperiorCourt (2006) 141 Cal.App.4th 1452, 1463.) However, “[t]he applicant must demonstrate a realthreat of immediate and irreparable injury.” (Triple A. Machine Shop, Inc. v. State of California(1989) 213 Cal.App.3d 131, 138.)Here, Plaintiffs will suffer harm because they will lose real property. With regard toPlaintiff’s three causes of action for fraud, a preliminary injunction is neither requested noravailable as a remedy, even if Plaintiff is likely to or in fact, succeeds on the merits of said claims.(Cal. Civil Code § 3343.) The complaint makes no request for injunctive relief in any of the threefraud causes of action. (Complaint, ¶¶ 31, 38, and 44.) “In general, if the plaintiff may be fullycompensated by the payment of damages in the event he prevails, then preliminary injunctiverelief should be denied.” (Tahoe Keys Property Owners' Assn. v. State Water Resources ControlBd. (1994) 23 Cal.App.4th 1459, 1471.) Likewise, Cal. Civil Code § 3343, which covers damagesresulting from the fraudulent sale of property, does not list injunctive relief as an available remedy.Therefore, the fraud claims must not be considered when evaluating Plaintiff’s request for apreliminary injunction.Plaintiff’s fourth cause of action for breach of duty care, honesty, good faith fair dealingand disclosure is only brought against Defendants eXp realty and Robach who are not affiliatedwith the party against whom the preliminary injunction is being sought. Thus, the fourth cause ofaction, and any conduct by eXp Realty or Robach, cannot be considered either.This leaves only Plaintiff’s fifth cause of action for violations of the unfair competition lawas defined by Cal. Business and Professions Code § 17200, et seq. (“UCL”). Business &Professions Code §17200 prohibits any business act or practice that is unlawful, unfair, orfraudulent. A cause of action for violating this statute “borrows” actionable conduct and makes itindependently actionable under the UCL. (Smith v. State Farm (2001) 93 Cal.App.4th 700, 718.)Here, Plaintiff could “borrow” the actionable conduct from the fraud allegations to support his UCLclaim. But, given the deposition testimony that is attached to Bank’s opposition, Plaintiff is notlikely to succeed on his fraud claims. Mr. Butter, who is the owner and CEO of Plaintiff, statesseveral times that he did not discuss the permit issue with Mr. Suk or anyone from Bank prior tomissing his first payment and after the loan was funded. (Declaration of Thomas Robins, ¶ 3,Exhibit 1.)Moreover, relief under the UCL requires ongoing wrongful business conduct. (CaliforniaService Station etc. Assn. v. Union Oil Co. (1991) 232 Cal.App.3d 44, 56-57.) This would requireongoing wrongful business conduct that makes the foreclosure itself wrongful. Plaintiff alleges noongoing fraudulent conduct. The complaint alleges a potential single act that impacted the sale ofthe Property. Additionally, Plaintiff admits that it had defaulted on the loan. (Declaration ofParminder Singh Butter, ¶ 10.) That alone gives Bank the right to foreclose on the Property.Therefore, it is not likely that Plaintiff will succeed in proving that he reasonably relied on anystatements made by Bank or its employees or agents to support the fraud claim against Bank.

Ruling

LINDA REINBOLD VS LAURA L LAZAR, ET AL.

Aug 22, 2024 |11/28/2022 |24SMCV00995

Case Number: 24SMCV00995 Hearing Date: August 22, 2024 Dept: N TENTATIVE RULING Plaintiff Linda Reinbolds Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. Plaintiff Linda Reinbold to give notice. REASONING Plaintiff Linda Reinbold (Plaintiff) moves the Court to issue a preliminary injunction enjoining Defendant Philippe B. Craig, Trustee of the Philippe B. Craig, Attorney at Law, 401k Profit Sharing Trust, FBO Philippe B. Craig, and his agents, officers, employees, representative, assigns, and all persons acting in concert or participating with him, including their principal, Phillip B. Craig (Craig), from engaging in, committing, or performing, directly or indirectly, by any means whatsoever, foreclosing and/or proceeding with any and all efforts to engaged in a forced non-judicial sale of Plaintiffs home located at 1333 Ashland Avenue, Santa Monica, California 90405. Legal Standard The function of a preliminary injunction is the preservation of the status quo until a final determination of the merits. (Beehan v. Lido Isle Cmty. Assn (1977) 70 Cal.App.3d 858, 866.) Trial courts traditionally consider and weigh two factors in determining whether to issue a preliminary injunction. They are (1) how likely it is that the moving party will prevail on the merits, and (2) the relative harm the parties will suffer in the interim due to the issuance or nonissuance of the injunction. (Dodge, Warren & Peters Ins. Servs., Inc. v. Riley (2003) 105 Cal.App.4th 1414, 1420.) The greater the showing on one, the less must be shown on the other to support an injunction. (Ibid., quoting Butt v. State of California (1992) 4 Cal.4th 668, 678, brackets and ellipses omitted.) The burden of proof is on the plaintiff as the moving party to show all elements necessary to support issuance of a preliminary injunction. (OConnell v. Superior Court (2006) 141 Cal.App.4th 1452, 1481.) Preliminary injunctive relief requires the use of competent evidence to create a sufficient factual showing on the grounds for relief. (See, e.g., Ancora-Citronelle Corp. v. Green (1974) 41 Cal.App.3d 146, 150 [injunction erroneously granted without verified complaint, affidavits, or declarations to support injunctive relief].) Injunctive relief may be granted based upon a verified complaint only if it contains sufficient evidentiary, as opposed to ultimate, facts. (Code Civ. Proc., § 527, subd. (a).) A plaintiff seeking injunctive relief must also show the absence of an adequate damages remedy at law. (Code Civ. Proc., § 526, subd. (a)(4).) A preliminary injunction may be classified as either a prohibitory injunction, which requires parties to refrain from a particular act, or a mandatory injunction, which requires parties to perform an affirmative act that changes the position of the parties. (Davenport v. Blue Cross of California (1997) 52 Cal.App.4th 435, 446.) Mandatory preliminary injunctions are rarely granted. (Teachers Insurance & Annuity Association v. Furlotti (1999) 70 Cal.App.4th 1487, 1493.) More specifically, [t]he granting of a mandatory injunction pending trial is not permitted except in extreme cases where the right thereto is clearly established. (Ibid.) Background Plaintiff alleges that in 2008, she met Defendant Laura L. Lazar aka Laura Gottlieb (Lazar) and developed a relationship with her, and in May 2013, Lazar approached Plaintiff with a request to borrow money against Plaintiffs property to complete renovations of Lazars residence with the intention of repurposing it as a wedding and event venue. (First Am. Compl. ¶¶ 10-16.) Lazar assured Plaintiff that she would be in a position to settle the loan within a year, and she reiterated her commitment to prioritizing the loan repayments, which would be serviced from Lazars monthly trust disbursem*nts. (First Am. Compl. ¶ 17.) Plaintiff agreed to the loan agreement, and Lazar arranged a loan with Craig, with Defendant Michael J. Christl (Christl) to act as a mortgage broker in the transaction. (First Am. Compl. ¶¶ 18-19.) The loan, which amounted to $550,000, was secured by placing a lien against Plaintiffs property located at 1333 Ashland Avenue in Santa Monica. (First Am. Compl. ¶ 19.) The loan application was prepared by Christl and his business Defendant CNC Investments, Incorporated dba California Private Lenders (CNC) and listed Plaintiff and Lazar as co-borrowers with the same address of 3537 Bayberry Lane, Malibu, California 90265, with differing incomes, and Plaintiff alleges that Craig, CNC, and Lazar engaged in subsequent discussions to remove Lazar as the co-borrower to the loan. (First Am. Compl. ¶ 20.) The funds were wired to Lazar, CNC, and Golden Rule Management FBO Martin Grant, and Plaintiff alleges that the funds were not used for Lazars wedding venue business but instead given directly to Grant. (First Am. Compl. ¶ 21.) Plaintiff alleges that neither CNC nor Christl met with or spoke to Plaintiff directly before the loan documents were signed or before Lazar was removed as a co-borrower obligated to the loan. (First Am. Compl. ¶ 22.) The loan was subsequently modified four different times, which increased the loan amount to $1,000,000 and extended the maturity date to December 1, 2023. (First Am. Compl. ¶¶ 24-27.) In July 2023, Lazar promised Plaintiff she would pay off the loan, as she had promised in the past, and Lazar told Plaintiff she needed to execute a Real Estate Power of Attorney so Lazar could extend the loan because Craig wanted to see a connection between Lazar and Plaintiffs property. (First Am. Compl. ¶ 30.) Plaintiff signed the document, and soon thereafter, Lazar told Plaintiff they needed to sell Plaintiffs home. (First Am. Compl. ¶ 31.) Plaintiff alleges that Lazar gained access to Plaintiffs residence to photograph the home and list it for sale, and Lazar claimed she needed to secure an additional loan, which could only be done if a legitimate offer was made. (First Am. Compl. ¶ 33.) Plaintiff learned that Lazar had only been paying off interest on the loan and not paying down the principal, and Plaintiff informed the realtor selling her house that she had not consented to the sale, so the house was taken off market, and Plaintiff executed a Revocation of Power of Attorney, revoking all authority previously granted to Lazar. (First Am. Compl. ¶¶ 33-35.) Plaintiff alleges that she consented to the initial loan of $550,000, but she did not consent to a $1,000,000 loan, and she signed the fourth modification only to extend the loan period because she believed she would lose her home if she did not do so. (First Am. Compl. ¶ 36.) The loan remains outstanding and unpaid, with the liability standing at approximately $1,000,000 in principal, with interest exceeding $52,709.74, and on November 14, 2023, Craig issued a Notice of Default and Election to Sell Under Deed of Trust, thereby initiating foreclosure proceedings. (First Am. Compl. ¶ 37.) Plaintiff alleges claims for fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, financial elder abuse, negligence, unfair business practices, breach of contract, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and quiet title, among others. Analysis The Court first considers the likelihood that Plaintiff will prevail on the merits. In short, Plaintiff contends that a preliminary injunction is warranted because there were indicia of fraud throughout the entire transaction based on Defendants conduct. Plaintiff contends that Lazars fraud, coupled with Christl, CNC, and Craigs actions of engaging in a pattern of unfair predatory real estate practices caused Plaintiff to become a victim of such behavior and to be in jeopardy of losing her home through foreclosure should the injunction not be granted. The Court focuses its analysis on the claims against Craig here, as Plaintiff seeks to enjoin Craigs ability to conduct foreclosure proceedings. While Defendants Christl and CNC have filed an opposition to the motion, the Court need not determine whether Plaintiff has demonstrated a likelihood of success on her claims against them because Plaintiff does not seek to enjoin any conduct by these defendants. As to Plaintiffs negligence claim, she must show that Craig owed her a duty of care. (See McIntyre v. Colonies-Pacific, LLC (2014) 228 Cal.App.4th 664, 671 [to state a claim for negligence, Plaintiff must allege the elements of (1) the existence of a legal duty of care, (2) breach of that duty, and (3) proximate cause resulting in an injury].) Plaintiff alleges that Craig had a duty to investigate and inquire about the suspicious loan given the indicia of third-party fraud arising out of payments being made from him to Lazar directly while Lazar was not on the property deeds, and Craig allowed Plaintiff to be the single borrower on the loan despite Plaintiffs income. (First Am. Compl. ¶ 90.) Plaintiffs other claims all require an element of showing a duty owed to Plaintiff by the named Defendants. The Court finds that Plaintiff cannot demonstrate a likelihood of succeeding on her claims. As to Craig, who is alleged to be Plaintiffs commercial lender on the subject loan, Plaintiff has failed to provide any evidence that Craig acted as a broker, attorney, fiduciary, or trustee as to this loan. [A]s a general rule, a [lender] owes no duty of care to a borrower when the institutions involvement in the loan transaction does not exceed the scope of its conventional role as a mere lender of money. (Nymark v. Heart Federal Savings & Loan Association (1991) 231 Cal.App.3d 1089, 1096.) If the Court were to hold Craig liable as a fiduciary simply based on his conduct as a lender, it would be conceivable that few lenders would provide loans, fearing liability simply for lending an individual money. While Craig could be liable if he had done more than provide funds to Plaintiff, Plaintiff has failed to show any such conduct. Further, there is no indication that Craig had any notice of issues with the loan or with Lazar when Craig acquired an interest in the property. Rather, Plaintiff signed documents affirming the validity of the loan, and Craig had no duty to explain the loan to Plaintiff or determine her ability to repay it. It follows that Plaintiff cannot show that Craig engaged in unfair business practices because Plaintiff must establish Craig was engaged in an unlawful, unfair or fraudulent business act or practice and unfair, deceptive, untrue or misleading advertising and certain specific acts (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200), and all that has been shown is that Craig was a lender on the loan. Further, Plaintiffs claims for declaratory relief, injunctive relief, and quiet title rely on the same allegations, and there is the requirement that Plaintiff has tendered the amount of the secured indebtedness on the property, which extends to all causes of action which are implicitly integrated with the allegedly wrongful sale. (Arnolds Management Co. v. Eischen (1984) 158 Cal.App.3d 575, 579.) A full tender must be made to set aside a foreclosure sale, and a plaintiff attacking a foreclosure sale is required to allege tender of the full amount owed. (See Stebley v. Litton Loan Servicing, LLP (2011) 202 Cal.App.4th 522, 526.) This requirement exists so plaintiffs may not recoup the property while evading their lawful debt on the property. (Ibid.) Plaintiff has provided no evidence that she has tendered the amount due to Craig or any other defendant. Further, Plaintiff has alleged she was involved in the loan process and subsequent modifications, even if certain documents were executed as a result of Lazars fraud, such that the trier of fact could hold Plaintiff liable for the representations she made in those documents. Finally, it is clear that Craig will suffer with the issuance of a preliminary injunction, as Plaintiff remains in the property despite her default on the loan, and Craig will continue to lose the value of his investment in providing a loan to Plaintiff if he is unable to foreclose on the property while also being unable to collect on the loan. Accordingly, Plaintiff Linda Reinbolds Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. Evidentiary Objections Defendants Christl and CNC object to certain statements within the declarations of Jake Babco*ck, Linda Reinbold, and Beth Chrisman, and the entire declaration of Caroline Knab. Objection Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, and 7 to 10 are SUSTAINED. Objection Nos. 3, 6, and 11 to 24 are OVERRULED. Plaintiff objects to certain statements within the declaration of Defendant Michael Christl, Andrew S. Louis, Gabrielle Gonzalez, Clay Wilkinson, and Defendant Phillippe B. Craig. Objection Nos. 1 to 20, 22, 31, 33, 34, 37 to 39, 42, 44, 46, and 58 are OVERRULED. Objection Nos. 21, 23 to 30, 32, 35, 36, 40, 41, 43, 45, and 47 are SUSTAINED as to the declarants legal conclusions but otherwise OVERRULED.

Ruling

1355 BEREA, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS YARDEN CONSULTING, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ET AL.

Aug 22, 2024 |6/18/2022 |24SMCV02409

Case Number: 24SMCV02409 Hearing Date: August 22, 2024 Dept: I The motion to expunge is CONTINUED. Plaintiff filed a wrongful foreclosure action against defendants. Plaintiff also filed a lis pendends on the theory that if it prevails, it is seeking the property back. Defendants move to expunge the lis pendens and plaintiff opposes. A lis pendens is an evidentiary motion. The court does not rely on the pleadings alone; it can (and should) consider evidence. Further, unlike a summary judgment motion, the court is to weigh the evidence to determine whether the plaintiff is likely to succeed or not. Here, many of the facts are not disputed. In 2023, plaintiff obtained a loan from defendant for $220,000. The property in question was security for the loan and plaintiff signed a Deed of Trust in defendants favor. There were two other loans. One was with First Bridge, and there was a second as well. There is some debate as to the loans priority. Plaintiff contends that they were all equal in rank, but defendant contends that it was in the third position with First Bridge in the first, or senior, position. For these purposes, though, the court is willing to assume that the issue is not material. The First Bridge loan was what it sounds like: a bridge loan. It was for a much larger sum than defendants loan. It was interest only for a relatively short time with a balloon payment due at the end. It is not really disputed that plaintiff did not make two of the interest only payments to First Bridge. However, First Bridge did not issue or record a Notice of Default. Even so, defendants learned of the nonpayment and elected to make the payments themselves to keep the First Bridge loan current. Defendants did so and then sent a Notice of Default to plaintiff, claiming a default on defendants loan and requiring plaintiff to pay defendants what defendants had paid First Bridge (although the number in the Notice of Default was higher than that). The basis for the default was plaintiffs default on the First Bridge loan and/or the failure to make the First Bridge payments. The notice of default was recorded in September 2023, stating that $89,345.85 was owed to defendants. Plaintiff did not cure the default or attempt to do so, which led defendants to record a Notice of Trustees Sale on December 22, 2023. That notice stated that the amount due to defendants was $574,962.79. The sale occurred on January 17, 2024, and a Trustees Deed Upon Sale was recorded on February 9, 2024. Defendants were the successful bidders. Plaintiff brings the instant action claiming that the foreclosure was wrongful and seeking (among other things) title to the property. In support of its position, plaintiff recorded a lis pendens. Defendants seek to expunge the lis pendens and plaintiff opposes. Plaintiff has objected to portions of the Valsky declaration. As to paragraph 12, Valsky states that defendants paid the monthly payments to First Bridge to protect defendants interest. The court believes Valsky has sufficient knowledge to make that statement. The objection is OVERRULED. There is another problem. Defendants submitted new evidence in reply. The court believes there is cause to allow that submission. If plaintiff really believes it needs to be able to respond to that evidence, the court will discuss it. (Plaintiff did object to it on this ground.) A lis pendens is a powerful tool. Because it is recorded, it puts the world on notice that the person holding title to the property might not have good title because the issue is being litigated. Accordingly, a buyer who buys the property after a lis pendens is filed buys with that knowledge and could be forced to give title to the plaintiff if the plaintiff ultimately prevails in the litigation even though the buyer is not a party to the litigation. Of course, the buyer might have recourse against the seller, but the buyer still loses the property. In contrast, but for the lis pendens, a buyer who is unaware of the litigation would be a buyer in due course and would take free and clear of the litigation. Because a seller cannot deliver clean title, a lis pendens has the practical effect (in many cases) of making the property unsaleable until the lis pendens is removed or significantly reducing the potential sale price. Moreover, a lis pendens can be recorded without judicial intervention or permission. A litigant simply files the papers and the deed (so to speak) is done. That is a powerful and inexpensive tool. The burden is on the defendant in the litigation to bring a motion to expunge the lis pendens, which will remain on the property until and unless that motion is granted (and for a while longer if there is an appeal). Motions to expunge a lis pendens are governed by CCP sections 405, et seq. To grant the motion, the court must make two findings (and then determine that a bond from plaintiff would not be a better option). The first is that the litigation, if successful, could effect title. The burden to show that is on the plaintiff, but it is often decided on the complaint alone. This makes obvious sense in that if the cause of action could not cause the plaintiff to have an interest in the property, then the lis pendens has no basis. The second finding is whether the claimant has not established by a preponderance of the evidence the probable validity of the real property claim. That is a bit oddly wordedthere is a sort of double negative. What it means is that although defendant is bringing the motion the burden of persuasion is on the plaintiff. If no one puts in any evidence of anything, the lis pendens will be expunged. Of course, the courts determination is not binding at trial; but it is final in the practical sense that if the motion is granted and the lis pendens is expunged (and the order is not reversed on appeal), then a buyer can take free and clear of the litigationeven if the buyer is aware of the litigation. Here, the first prong is easily met. If plaintiff prevails in the wrongful foreclosure action, the property might revert to plaintiff. After all, it is the defendant who allegedly wrongfully foreclosed and who now holds title through the allegedly wrongful foreclosure. If plaintiff succeeds, title could be restored. It is the second prong where the issue is joined. A major question is whether defendants actions to protect their security interest gave rise to a default under the documents. The relevant loan agreement provision states that a failure to pay on a timely basis, or the occurrence of any other default under any note, . . . constitutes a default under the agreement. In the event of a default, the contract allows defendants to act to protect their interest without notice, and that would include protecting against a foreclosure by First Bridge. The problem is in part that elsewhere, the following appears. [I]f there is any action or proceeding (including, without limitation, any judicial or nonjudicial proceeding to foreclose the lien of a junior or senior mortgage or deed of trust) affecting or purporting to affect the Mortgaged Property, this Security Instrument, Lenders security for the performance of the Obligations and payment of the Indebtedness, or the rights or powers of Lender or Trustee under the Loan Agreement, the Note or this Security Instrument, Lender or Trustee may (but is not obligated to) (a) make any such payment or do any such act in such manner and to such extent as either deems necessary to preserve or protect the Mortgaged Property . . . . The area of dispute is this. While there is no real dispute that plaintiff did not make two First Bridge interest payments, First Bridge never issued a notice of default. Defendants made the payments but not because the loan had been declared defaulted. According to plaintiff, that is fatal to defendants case because there was no action or proceeding that had been commenced toward foreclosing on the property. Plaintiffs reading is that defendants can advance the money to First Bridge only if the loan has been declared in default (and maybe not until a notice of sale is issued), not just because a payment has not been made. By way of hypothetical example, consider the situation where plaintiff had arranged with First Bridge to agree to give plaintiff 60 days grace to make two interest payments. That agreement would not be reflected in any County Recorders office document; it might be reflected only in an exchange of emails. It might well be that defendants would look and see that the payments were not made, but it would make little sense for defendants to be able to front the payment and then declare a default. Nor is that such a strange hypothetical. This was a bridge loanthe interest only payments mattered, but the loan was coming due shortly in any event. The question is whether the contract gave defendants the right to make payments on the other loans if plaintiff did not do so even if the lender elected not to declare the other loan to be in default. Defendants, on the other hand, contend that paragraph 7.1.12 (quoted above) of the loan documents is an independent event of defaultdifferent from the default that occurs if there is a proceeding (which is in paragraph 7.1.6). Thus, the defense claims, it is an alternative basis of a default, and that is sufficient. The weird and odd thing is that it is unclear that defendants right to make payments to secure its position, which can be found in paragraph 10 of the Deed of Trust (for example) arises not upon plaintiffs failure to make a payment to another lender, but rather when there is an action or proceeding instituted by another lender that might impair defendants position in the property. Thus, one might argue, it might have been proper for defendants to have claimed a default due to the nonpayment of interest on the First Bridge loan, but the cure would only be some agreement by First Bridge that it would not take any action on that basis (perhaps). The documents are not 100% clear to the court. The court believes that the better reading at least at this stage, is that defendants did not have the right to make the payment to First Bridge unilaterally and demand reimbursem*nt by plaintiff, at least given that First Bridge had not even declared a default. Under the law and the various contracts here, a junior (or co-equal) lender has plenty of time to protect its interest once a notice of default is issued. The notice is issued and there is a cure period. During that period, the junior (or co-equal) lender can cure the default and subrogate itself to declaring its own loan in default if the borrower does not reimburse. And that is the whole point. The point of allowing another lender to cure the other default is to protect the security and the other lenders security interest. Curing a default that has not been declared does not serve such a purpose. Worse, to allow it to occur discourages a borrower from trying to reach an accord with the other lender because even if the borrower reaches such an agreement, the junior (or co-equal) lender can nonetheless create a formal default and create an immediate financial obligation on the borrower. (Here, had the default been only the failure to make payments to First Bridge, the cure might have been nothing more than a letter from First Bridge that it was permitting the delay.) Because the courts reading of the contract allowed the defendants here to pay First Bridge and then declare a default only if First Bridge had first declared a default, at least based on the record thus far, the notice of default may have been flawed and hence the sale could be improper. All of that said, neither party really briefed this issue. Defendants just assume that they had the right to make the payment to First Bridge even though there is no evidence that they had contacted First Bridge to see if First Bridge even cared or was going to do something that might impair defendants collateral. But the documents are not quite that clear. Plaintiff, on the other hand, just assumes that defendants had no rights with regard to the First Bridge loan at all. The court would appreciate supplemental simultaneous briefs addressing this issue, with evidence if need be. There is a second problem. The amount of the default ought to have been essentially two months of interest. The notice of default, though, was almost $90,000, which seems higher than the amount actually paid by defendants to First Bridge. But even if defendants notice of default had the right amount (due to late fees), the notice of sale lists an amount six times greater. In fact, even if one adds in all of defendants outstanding loan balance the notice of trustees sale is about twice what the number should have been. Defendants have suggested no explanation for this that the court recalls seeing. Defendants counter by saying that the notice of trustee sale is valid whether or not the amount is correctthe amount is mere extra information. The court is not so sure. At least on this record, the court does not view what may be a very incorrect amount as a technical defect that it can so easily overlook. For example, if that is the amount due and owing under the loan at issue, one might well assume that the lender would submit a credit bid, which informs how the auction would go; if the amount is double the amount of the loan, then the credit bid would be different. If such is the case, then this provides an alternative reason to deny the motion. Again, there is not a lot of briefing on this. Defendants just assume this away, but they provide no authority that the amount set forth in the Notice of Trustees Sale is irrelevant. Plaintiff assumes that it must be relevant even though the property is going to be sold to the highest bidder at auction, and so the amount in that document is not really the cure amount needed to be paid by plaintiff to bring the loan current. The motion will be CONTINUED to allow that briefing. The court will discuss timing with the parties. Because there is no evidence that the property is declining in value or that defendants are suffering any immediate injury due to the lis pendens, the court is not inclined to require any bond at this moment. That may change at the next hearing.

Ruling

- GRESIO, TINA vs MYERS, BEVERLY J

Aug 25, 2024 |CV-24-004770

CV-24-004770 - GRESIO, TINA vs MYERS, BEVERLY J - Plaintiff's Motion For Preliminary Injunction Prohibiting Eviction, Encumbrances,and Sale Of Property Ccp526(A)(1)-(4); 527(A) - CONTINUED, at the moving party’s request, to October 9, 2024 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 23.

Ruling

YAEL MAGUIRE ET AL VS. EASTWOOD DEVELOPMENT INC. ET AL

Aug 23, 2024 |CGC23607922

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for August 23, 2024 line 7. DEFENDANT EASTWOOD DEVELOPMENT INC., LUCAS EASTWOOD, 4028 25TH STREET, LLC DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT is transferred to department 302 to be heard on September 6, 2024. The previous transfer of this construction defect case to department 501 was in error. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear.

Document

WELLS FARGO BANK NAvs.UNKNOWN HEIRS, DEVISEES, THROUGH, UNDER OR AGAINST THE ESTATE OF ALBERT KURTZWEG, DECEASED et al.

Sep 26, 2023 |Heather Pinder Rodriguez |CA - Nonhomestead Residential Foreclosure ($50,001-249,999) |CA - Nonhomestead Residential Foreclosure ($50,001-249,999) |2023-CA-015523-O

Document

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY vs. NELLUS, JEAN YVESet al.

Aug 23, 2024 |Patricia L. Strowbridge |CA - Homestead Residential Foreclosure btwn $50,001-$249,999 |CA - Homestead Residential Foreclosure btwn $50,001-$249,999 |2024-CA-007548-O

Document

VISTANA SPRINGS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION INC A FLORvs.UNKNOWN PARTIES AS TO INGRID FUNTANILLA et al.

Aug 20, 2024 |A. James Craner, III |CA - Other Real Property Actions (up to $50,000) |CA - Other Real Property Actions (up to $50,000) |2024-CA-007404-O

Document

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY vs. NELLUS, JEAN YVESet al.

Aug 23, 2024 |Patricia L. Strowbridge |CA - Homestead Residential Foreclosure btwn $50,001-$249,999 |CA - Homestead Residential Foreclosure btwn $50,001-$249,999 |2024-CA-007548-O

Document

WELLS FARGO BANK NAvs.UNKNOWN HEIRS, DEVISEES, THROUGH, UNDER OR AGAINST THE ESTATE OF ALBERT KURTZWEG, DECEASED et al.

Sep 26, 2023 |Heather Pinder Rodriguez |CA - Nonhomestead Residential Foreclosure ($50,001-249,999) |CA - Nonhomestead Residential Foreclosure ($50,001-249,999) |2023-CA-015523-O

Document

BANK OF AMERICA N Avs.HEITZ, LAUREN A et al.

Aug 21, 2024 |A. James Craner, III |CA - Nonhomestead Residential Foreclosure ($50,001-249,999) |CA - Nonhomestead Residential Foreclosure ($50,001-249,999) |2024-CA-007470-O

Document

THIRD WORLD MISSIONS INC vs. NEW LIFE FELLOWSHIP MISSIONARY BAPTIST INC

Aug 23, 2024 |Heather Pinder Rodriguez |CA - Commercial Foreclosure (btwn $50,001 - $249,999) |CA - Commercial Foreclosure (btwn $50,001 - $249,999) |2024-CA-007554-O

Document

BEACON PARK PHASE 3 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INCvs.ROMERO DUBON, JOSE DAVID et al.

Aug 21, 2024 |Luis F. Calderon |CA - Other Real Property Actions (up to $50,000) |CA - Other Real Property Actions (up to $50,000) |2024-CA-007429-O

Complaint May 16, 2011 (2024)

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Annamae Dooley

Last Updated:

Views: 6176

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (65 voted)

Reviews: 80% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Annamae Dooley

Birthday: 2001-07-26

Address: 9687 Tambra Meadow, Bradleyhaven, TN 53219

Phone: +9316045904039

Job: Future Coordinator

Hobby: Archery, Couponing, Poi, Kite flying, Knitting, Rappelling, Baseball

Introduction: My name is Annamae Dooley, I am a witty, quaint, lovely, clever, rich, sparkling, powerful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.